June 11, 2020
As the world transitions to a “new normal”, insurers will face a change in the claims landscape. New types of claims will emerge while insurers may see an evolution or even decrease in the traditional types. Here are the types of claims and how they could change in the post-COVID world.
Motor Vehicle Accident Claims
Insurers across the board have decreased premiums, offered rebates or provided coverage modifications because Canadians are driving less. There are fewer Canadians commuting to work, and shops, bars and restaurants are largely closed. As a result, insurers will likely see a decrease in motor vehicle accident claims in 2020.
In fact, insurers and governments in North America are already starting to note a trend:
However, a side effect of empty streets has been an increase in dangerous behaviours.
People may be driving less but some are driving more dangerously. Some drivers are taking open roads as carte blanche to act recklessly, which may lead to an increase in serious claims rather than motor vehicle accident claims.
Business Interruption Claims
Traditional commercial policies are less likely to cover claims for business interruption relating to COVID-19. Typically, business interruption coverage is meant to cover expenses and lost revenue relating to a covered loss, for example, if a business has to shut down due to fire damage. Most policies require proof of physical damage to the insured’s premises. Although “contamination” has been found in certain cases to be “physical damage” there has yet to be commentary in Canada on whether the presence of a virus may be considered “contamination”. Further, most businesses are not closed because there is an outbreak of the virus on their premises but rather as a preventative measure or as ordered by local authorities. It is questionable whether losses arising from preventative measures will be covered, and a review of policy language is required in every case.
Certain insureds may seek to claim coverage where their policy responds to losses due to “Interruption by Civil Authority”. As a case example, a restauranteur in Toronto has filed suit against his insurer following a denied claim for loss profits and expenses arguing he has coverage under the civil authority language. The policy contained wording that there was coverage for losses “caused by order of civil authority to retard or prevent a conflagration or other catastrophe” but the claim was denied because his properties did not suffer damage.
Civil authority coverage is meant to provide coverage for “loss of business income, rental value and extra expenses incurred because of denied access or forced evacuation”. However, according to HUB International, often there are a number of conditions to this coverage including:
1. The denial of access must be due to an incident of physical damage to a nearby property.
2. Damage to that nearby property must be due to a peril covered under your insurance policy.
3. There is a limit to the length of time the business interruption coverage applies. Usually between 15 and 30 days.
4. Business interruption coverage usually has a deductible in the form of a waiting period. The typical range is 24-72 hours.
While most businesses did not typically carry coverage to recoup losses sustained during a pandemic, some businesses were almost clairvoyant in their coverage purchases. In the sport of tennis, The Wimbledon Championship had been purchasing pandemic coverage since the SARS outbreak in 2003. The cost of the coverage was approximately CAD $2.6 million per year or approximately CAD $45 million over the entire period. While the payout of approximately CAD $200 million will not necessarily cover the entire loss suffered by the cancellation of this year’s tennis tournament, it turned out to be a wise decision.
At the end of the day, business interruption coverage is likely to be one of the most litigated issues post-COVID. A Regina, Saskatchewan based law firm with offices across Canada has already announced it is launching a national class-action against a number of insurers in Canada for denied business interruption claims.
Long-Term Care Claims
Nursing homes have been ground-zero for the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. According to some sources, as of May 7, 2020 82% of Canada’s COVID-19 deaths have been linked to long-term care homes. The majority of these deaths have occurred in Ontario and Quebec. However, as of June 5, 2020, 53 of the 61 deaths from COVID-19 in Nova Scotia were tied to one long-term care facility.
Lawsuits have already started to be filed:
The challenge with these claims will be to establish the standard of care required during a pandemic and to show that the actions of the homes and the care provided to the residents breached this standard of care, leading to illness or death. Additionally, many of these actions claim punitive damages, which are typically excluded under traditional commercial policies.
Perhaps an unintended result of the COVID-19 outbreak in long-term care facilities, and the resulting investigations into the individual facilities, will be to bring to light other claims unrelated to COVID-19.
Cyber Claims
Many individuals have had their entire lives moved online. From work and shopping to social interaction. With the increase in online presence, comes an increase of the potential for claims from businesses who had the foresight to purchase cyber policies.
As of mid-March, a large proportion of the workforce in Canada began working from home and businesses had to pivot their operations quickly to accommodate this new working arrangement, potentially without fully reviewing their cybersecurity systems. Without properly assessing cyber risks, including vulnerability in their technologies, use of older technologies and the technological savviness of their employees, as well as the physical threat of stolen laptops or other company equipment, companies may suffer losses or be liable for data breaches.
A number of businesses moved the services they provide to their customers online. Whether it is clothing stores, grocery stores or restaurants newly offering food delivery and pick-up. Shopify, an e-commerce platform for online retailers, saw a 62% increase in new online stores on its platform between March 13 to April 24, 2020. For this business model to work, businesses must collect and store data from their costumers. Given the speed at which these businesses had to adapt, many without a previous online presence, they are at higher risk of being victims of cyber-attacks or data breaches. These attacks might result in an increase of cyber claims being filed.
Finally, the provincial and federal governments are urging Canadians to download contact-tracing applications for their smartphones. These applications identify, inform and monitor people who might have come in contact with a person who has been diagnosed with an infectious disease. However, a number of different companies are scrambling to develop the application of choice. Aside from the privacy concerns that relate to these applications, there are also cyber risks when this type of data is collected.
By offering flexibility to their employees, providing new services or finding new methods to fight the virus, businesses may open themselves up to cyber-attacks and, for businesses with cyber coverage, their insurers to a wide range of claims.
Other Claims
There are a number of other areas where we may see changes or new types of claims.
The pandemic has and will prove to be unpredictable for the insurance industry. Insurance companies, like all other businesses, have been doing their best to pivot and respond to the uncertainty. The claims landscape will be altered for the near future and the more prepared an insurer is respond to the new “normal”, the better the outcome.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our Insurance Defence Law Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2020. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Nov 13, 2024
Social host liability for injury to a third party – and coverage of social host liability claims – isn’t straightforward. Social host…
Sep 5, 2024
The 2024 decision of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador – General Division in Interprint Systems Limited et al. v. Co-operators…
May 17, 2024
Do cultural practices play a role in the assessment of damages for wrongful death claims? There is British Columbia precedent for awarding…
Jan 9, 2024
In a decision that will be helpful in future assessments of damages for soft tissue injuries, on December 21, 2023, the Nova Scotia Court of…
Nov 14, 2023
In its October 19, 2023 decision in Roach v. Nordic Ins. Co. of Canada, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court confirmed that Workers’ Compensation…
Oct 4, 2023
Insureds aren't automatically entitled to a defence from their insurers. Liability policies generally provide two types of coverage: coverage…
Jun 12, 2023
The Nova Scotia Supreme Court has added a new, lower range for general damages in sexual abuse civil cases. Damages in sex abuse cases are…
Mar 30, 2023
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently sent a strong message to insureds: utmost good faith is not only key but is required in insurance claims.…
Dec 13, 2022
The insurer’s duty to defend a claim made against its insured is inextricably tied to coverage: there can be no duty to defend without a…
Apr 18, 2022
On March 28, 2022, the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (General Division) decided that in a personal injury case, quantification of…
Mar 29, 2022
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent consideration of estoppel and waiver in the context of a fatal injury case in Trial Lawyers Association…
Nov 23, 2021
On November 19, 2021, in Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, the Supreme…
Oct 29, 2021
On October 21, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the law concerning the circumstances in which government organizations - including…
Sep 23, 2021
On September 9, 2021, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal released its decision in Aviva Insurance v. PK Construction Ltd. Dealing with Nova…
Apr 17, 2020
The global and domestic spread of COVID-19 has forced Canadians to reassess their upcoming travel plans – and insurers to assess their travel…
Feb 14, 2020
NOTE: On July 23, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed with the Newfoundland & Labrador Court of Appeal’s decision respecting the law,…
Jan 14, 2020
On December 23, 2019, the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal effectively eliminated the category of “knowledgeable fact witness” in…
Nov 22, 2019
On November 20, 2019, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal confirmed pursuant to section 113BA(1) of Nova Scotia’s Insurance Act, in the context of…
Jan 21, 2019
On January 18, 2019, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal rendered its unanimous (5-0) decision in Holland v. Sparks, overturning a motion decision…
Oct 25, 2018
NOTE: On November 20, 2019, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s decision and confirmed pursuant to section 113BA(1) of…
May 11, 2018
On May 8, 2018, for the first time, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court has ruled on the deductibility of Workers’ Compensation Board Extended…
Jan 25, 2018
Insurers have generally been leery of coverage for medical cannabis in both the health benefit claims and in cost of care claims in the personal…
Jul 10, 2017
The legal landscape of cannabis (a.k.a. marihuana, weed, pot …) is changing, both reflecting - and contributing to - more relaxed attitudes…
Jun 5, 2017
On June 2, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that where a plaintiff advances a claim for negligently caused psychological or psychiatric…
May 3, 2017
On May 2, 2017, the N.S. Court of Appeal decided another case involving the deductibility of CPP disability benefits – but this time, in the…
Jan 30, 2017
On January 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Sabean v. Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co. that future CPP disability…
Aug 17, 2016
The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently affirmed the test for confirming a cause of action and thus resetting a limitation period…
Jul 5, 2016
The Ontario Court of Appeal has re-ignited the discussion about when a municipality will be held liable for its shoddy bylaw enforcement…
Jun 20, 2016
Real estate vendors and purchasers have high expectations of their realtors – and they don’t often hesitate to pursue legal action against…
Apr 15, 2016
On April 14, 2016, Canada’s federal Justice Minister proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Jan 27, 2016
On January 21, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dramatically expanded the scope of legal privacy protection – and the liability…
Feb 9, 2015
NOTE: On April 14, 2016, the federal government proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
May 2, 2014
April showers bring … flood and sewage back-up claims. Flooding and sewage back-up can result in significant damage for municipal ratepayers,…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.