March 4, 2022
On December 17, 2021, New Brunswick’s Local Governance Reform Act (Bill 82) amending the N.B. Local Governance Act (and other related acts and regulations) took effect. The Bill will drastically change New Brunswick’s local governance landscape, with broad-reaching implications for existing and newly created local governments. And it will do so quickly: the reform will be phased in over three years, but the bulk of the foundational work must happen in 2022. Both the N.B. Department of Local Government and Local Governance Reform and local governments have their work cut out in the months ahead. To help all stakeholders understand what to expect and how they can optimize their role in the transition process, here are the answers to five key questions local governments are asking us about N.B. local governance reform.
1. What’s the Bill do?
New Brunswick is currently divided into 340 local entities: eight cities, 26 towns, 61 villages, eight rural communities, one regional municipality, and 236 local service districts (LSDs). The Bill reduces this to just 90 local entities: 78 local governments and 12 rural districts. The rural districts are similar to LSDs, the unincorporated areas outside of the territorial limits of local governments. However, they’re much larger; many will have a population equivalent to a local government. The Bill achieves this reduction in three ways:
Amalgamation. Amalgamating two or more existing local governments. Where the Bill amalgamates two or more local governments, a new incorporated local government entity is created, and an election for the new local government of that entity is required. The newly elected council will form a “First Council”.
Annexation. Annexing portions of former local governments and LSDs to existing local governments. Where an annexation results in a population increase of more than 50% in the new local government territory, a new incorporated local government entity is created, and an election for a First Council is required. Where an annexation results in a population increase between 15% and 50% in the new territory, no new incorporated local government entity is created, but by-elections to add new councilors to the existing council are required. Since the existing local government council structure remains intact, the resulting council isn’t a “First Council”. Where annexation results in a population change of less than 15%, there’s no newly created local government entity, and no elections required.
Rural districts. Establishing a rural district for each service commission territory covering all areas other than the new or expanded local governments. Rural district residents will elect the councilors who will represent them on the advisory committees established for the transition to the new structure, as well as elect the officials who will represent them on their Regional Service Commission board.
The Bill sets November 28, 2022 as the date of all elections.
2. What’s the process to transition from the current to the new local governance structure?
The Province has established a transition process, in which the Minister, representatives of the Province, and the local governments affected by the reforms each have a part to play:
The Minister. Elections only occur on November 28, 2022, yet the restructuring is effective on January 1, 2023. The work required to implement the reforms by the January 1, 2023 effective date is substantial. To achieve this, the Bill confers on the Minister the authority to do all of the things that a First Council would do in any other restructuring, plus some additional powers to facilitate combining different size local governments with different asset bases. Using this authority, the Minister’s role is to take the steps necessary to create the basic structure of new local government entities, including to:
We expect the Minister’s ultimate goal is to have all necessary procedural mechanisms for the First Council in place by January 1, 2023, and effectively hand over to the First Council a turn-key local government on that date.
Transition Facilitators. The Province assigned a “Transition Facilitator” to each local government entity affected by the reform. The Facilitators’ role is to work with each affected local government to prepare for and implement the transition to the new structure. It’s anticipated the Transition Facilitators will also liase between the local governments and the Provincial Department during the transitional period.
Advisory Committees. The Transition Facilitators have established “advisory committees” for each major restructuring, each comprised of members of the local governments involved in the particular restructuring. The advisory committees’ role is crucial: to give the Transition Facilitator input and advice respecting the transition issues that will need to be addressed to implement the restructuring – and there are many. We note that the Bill doesn’t require the creation of the advisory committees or mandate the participation of any local government members as part of the process. As a result, participation in the advisory committees is an opportunity for local government members to provide advice to the Transition Facilitators in structuring the new local government that will take effect on January 1, 2023. Based on the Bill, refusal to participate in an advisory committee, or a situation where an advisory committee refused to meet the timelines the Minister set, will not automatically hold up the restructuring process.
3. What roles will existing councils & New First Councils play?
Both existing councils and First Councils of newly created local governments will have different roles to play in the restructuring process.
Existing Councils. The most significant role existing councils can play in the restructuring process is appointing members, and providing meaningful guidance, to the advisory committee and Transition Facilitators, giving affected local governments a voice in shaping the restructured local government that will take effect on January 1, 2023. Beyond that, the Bill doesn’t suspend the powers of any existing local government councils while the Minister’s powers are in effect; they remain intact. This ensures all existing local governments can continue to exercise their authority to manage the government’s affairs during the transition period. However, once the First Council is elected, the existing council is prohibited from taking certain actions that may affect the future administration of the new local government without authorization by the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, including making or amending bylaws, disposing of capital assets, and appointing or dismissing officers and employees.
First Councils. While it’s impossible to know the content or form of the turn-key solution the Minister will hand over to the newly elected First Councils on January 1, 2023, it’s likely that it will, at the very least, include a full set of procedural bylaws, a simple budget, and a complement of municipal officers. The First Council will then be in a position to exercise all of the regular powers the Local Governance Act grants a First Council for a period of six months after taking the oath or making the affirmation of office. The Bill also preserves a First Council’s ability to exercise its powers under the Local Governance Act from the time members take the oath or make the affirmation of office until December 31, 2022, even if its action conflicts with those taken by the Minister under the Bill. Practically, however, there is likely to be minimal, if any, overlap: the elections are on November 28, 2022, and the Minister’s transitional powers cease on December 31, 2022.
4. What are the key considerations for existing councils advising Transition Facilitators?
While the Minister has the authority necessary to effect the restructured local governments, he will likely exercise that authority based on the recommendations of the Transition Specialists, informed by the affected local governments through the advisory committees. This creates an important – and unique – opportunity for existing councils to ensure local or regional considerations are accounted for when establishing the new local governments. And practically, it’s likely that at least some, if not many, elements of the structure the Minister hands over to First Councils on January 1, 2023 will be in place for some time after the effective date, making the initial structure important to get right. Some of the key considerations local governments will want to consider include:
Making, Amending & Repealing Bylaws. Many local governments might have outdated bylaws, perhaps lacking the resources to review and update them. The reform offers the opportunity to tackle this daunting task, and make new bylaws to fill gaps, amend existing by-laws to modernize them, and repeal outdated bylaws. Newly formed local government entities won’t inherit the bylaws of their predecessors wholesale. Instead, they will inherit whatever bylaws the Minister creates using his transition powers under the Bill. Practically, this is likely to entail reviewing the bylaws of the amalgamating local governments, and deciding which to implement as is, which to revise, and which to disregard. Where the reforms expand an existing council, the bylaws of the expanded local government will remain in effect, and will extend to the annexed area. This will likely still require a review of existing bylaws to ensure they fit the expanded local government entity, and amendment or creation of bylaws to address new needs resulting from the expansion. Some areas to contemplate include:
Labour & Employment Issues. The reforms will undoubtedly result in the duplication of positions and duties and, in some cases, conflicting bargaining rights between unions, likely triggering a myriad of labour and employment law issues. The Bill gives the Minister the authority to deal with these issues, but existing local governments have the knowledge the Minister needs to do so effectively:
Regional Service Commission Relationship. The existing 12 N.B. service regions and 12 Regional Service Commissions remain. However, each service region will be comprised of one rural district and several local governments, and the boundaries of each service region will be redrawn. The Regional Service Commissions will also be restructured, ultimately impacting the relationship between local governments and rural districts and their Regional Service Commission and each other. Local governments will need to keep this in mind during the transition planning, and in particular:
Taxation. The reforms effect or trigger several critical changes to how taxation occurs within newly created local government entities:
5. What’s coming down the road?
The reforms under the Bill don’t end on January 1, 2023. There are more reforms coming over the next couple of years for which both existing and newly formed councils will need to be prepared, including:
Provincial Tax Plan Phase 2. The Province has announced a second phase to its taxation plan that will consider provincial property tax rates, the cost of roads, taxation of condos and apartments, the implementation of gas tax funding, and the creation of a municipal assessment committee. Local governments will need to navigate these new policies and initiatives as they are introduced.
Economic Development Agencies. A number of local governments are parties to economic development entities established under the N.B. Companies Act to promote economic development in their respective local areas. Generally, those entities are funded by agreement between the local governments involved, and use some form of cost-sharing mechanism based on population size or assessed tax base. As a result of the changes to territorial boundaries, local government entities, and the expanded mandate of the Regional Service Commissions, local governments will need to revisit existing agreements with, and funding to, these development entities.
Third-Party Contracts. Restructuring presents the opportunity to review and perhaps amend or, in some cases renegotiate, contracts with third party service providers (such as garbage pick-up). Local governments will also need to be watchful for potential litigation around alleged breaches of contracts with third-party service providers due to the amalgamation of two or more local governments.
Land Planning. As part of the local governance reforms, changes to land use planning include:
Inclusionary Zoning. The Province will also amend the Community Planning Act to give local governments a new tool to manage increasing affordable housing issues, empowering them to adopt inclusionary zoning bylaws requiring affordable housing units in new multi-unit developments.
Provincial Funding. The Province will also introduce amendments to the N.B. Community Funding Act by January 1, 2023, implementing a new grant formula for equalization funding. Local governments and rural districts will likely also need to negotiate and enter agreements and memorandums of understanding with the Province regarding provincial funding programs.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our Municipal Law Team @ McInnes Cooper for help understanding how to optimize your role in N.B.’s local governance reform.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2022. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Jun 26, 2024
An increasing number of municipalities in Canada are using public video camera surveillance to promote public safety and help deter crimes like…
Oct 29, 2021
On October 21, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the law concerning the circumstances in which government organizations - including…
Aug 8, 2019
Updated May 2, 2024. Canadian provinces are looking to immigration as a solution to labour market shortages, and the health sector is no…
Jun 29, 2018
The Crown’s duty to consult Indigenous Peoples has evolved considerably since the Supreme Court of Canada’s first detailed articulation of…
Jun 13, 2018
Updated September 26, 2024. Businesspeople (and their legal counsel) are on the road more than ever before: according to Statistics Canada,…
Apr 17, 2018
Updated January 12, 2023. There’s no shortage of media coverage about a doctor shortage in Canada and the resulting impact on Canada’s…
Jul 28, 2017
All stakeholders in any major project development already know that adequate consultation before - rather than after - a project is approved is…
Jul 10, 2017
The legal landscape of cannabis (a.k.a. marihuana, weed, pot …) is changing, both reflecting - and contributing to - more relaxed attitudes…
Apr 21, 2017
In three years (lightning speed in the law), medically assisted dying went from being illegal to being legal. A great deal has changed, a great…
Apr 20, 2017
On April 13, 2017, Canada’s federal government introduced legislation that, if passed into law, will legalize recreational cannabis in Canada.…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Jul 5, 2016
The Ontario Court of Appeal has re-ignited the discussion about when a municipality will be held liable for its shoddy bylaw enforcement…
Jun 17, 2016
In its June 16, 2016 decision in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Châteauguay (City), the Supreme Court of Canada decided a municipality’s…
May 10, 2016
On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada generally affirmed the common law rule that positive covenants do not run with the land. More…
Apr 15, 2016
On April 14, 2016, Canada’s federal Justice Minister proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Apr 15, 2015
On April 15, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada decided the City of Saguenay’s recitation of a religious - though non-denominational – prayer…
Feb 9, 2015
NOTE: On April 14, 2016, the federal government proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Feb 2, 2015
On January 30, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada decided that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom’s protection for freedom of…
May 2, 2014
April showers bring … flood and sewage back-up claims. Flooding and sewage back-up can result in significant damage for municipal ratepayers,…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.