January 18, 2023
Regulatory bodies across Canada are finding themselves subject to increased scrutiny in light of concerns surrounding workforce shortages, access to professional or occupational services, and patient safety issues within the healthcare sector. This scrutiny has resulted in increased “meta-regulation”, with governments imposing on regulatory bodies an additional layer of oversight, often with the objective of speeding up the assessment and registration process for internationally educated applicants. Regulators in Nova Scotia, and as of 2022, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador, operate in a legislative framework that requires regular reporting on registration practices. Given the proliferation of fair registration practices legislation in Canada, particularly Atlantic Canada, it’s reasonable for Prince Edward Island regulators to expect similar legislation on the horizon – and to begin preparing for the inevitable.
A proactive approach to evolving fair registration practices requirements will ensure regulatory bodies are prepared to re-deploy their resources toward satisfying their obligations to government and avoid the imposition of compliance measures. To help regulators understand fair registration practices legislation and their obligations under it, here are the answers to four key questions about fair registration practices legislation.
1. What is “fair registration practices legislation”?
Fair registration practices legislation includes any legislation a province implements that sets out standards and requirements that provincial or occupational regulatory bodies must follow regarding registration, in accordance with the Canada Free Trade Agreement (CFTA).
Provincial regulatory bodies set standards for how a regulated profession or occupation can be practiced, and by whom. This includes setting policies, practices, and procedures for the registration of people who apply to practice a regulated profession or occupation. Before practicing a regulated profession or occupation within a Canadian province, individuals must first successfully register with the appropriate regulatory body. Chapter 7 of the CFTA governs labor mobility. In accordance with the CFTA, provinces must ensure that regulatory bodies implement fair registration practices that are transparent, objective, impartial, procedurally fair, and consistent with workers’ mobility rights. The most effective way for provinces to ensure that regulatory bodies employ appropriate registration practices is through the introduction of fair registration practices legislation.
2. Which provinces or territories have implemented fair registration practices legislation?
To date, seven Canadian provinces have implemented fair registration practice legislation:
3. What are the general duties of regulatory bodies subject to fair registration practices legislation?
All provinces that have implemented fair registration practices legislation administer their statutes and monitor regulatory bodies for compliance with the legislation in a similar manner: through a government office or agency. While the specific duties of regulatory bodies differ under the legislation of each province, all impose the same general duties: fair registration practices legislation requires regulatory bodies to establish registration practices that are:
4. How are fair registration practices established and monitored in Atlantic Canada?
To date, all Atlantic provinces with the sole exception of Prince Edward Island have implemented fair registration practices legislation.
Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia’s Fair Registration Practices Act currently applies to 49 regulatory bodies in the province and sets standards regarding the practices employed to register individuals applying to become a member of a regulated profession or occupation. In addition to the general duties of fairness, the N.S. Act requires regulatory bodies to:
The N.S. Department of Labour, Skills and Immigration administers the N.S. Act through a Review Officer who: establishes guidelines regarding a regulator’s reporting requirements; advises regulators about their obligations under the Act; assists regulatory bodies in meeting their reporting requirements; prepares an annual report on the implementation of the Act to the Minister of Labor and Advanced Education; and issues compliance orders against regulators that are non-compliant with the legislation. In November 2021, Nova Scotia’s Fair Registration Practices Act was amended to provide regulators with clarity about the statistical data they must submit to the Review Officer. Additional amendments were included to extend the reporting period from every two to every five years, and to allow non-compliant regulators one year to demonstrate compliance.
New Brunswick. New Brunswick’s Fair Registration Practices in Regulated Professions Act currently applies to 50 regulatory bodies within the province. In addition to the general duties of fairness and transparency, the N.B. Act focuses heavily on meeting workforce demands by ensuring that internationally educated workers face as few barriers as possible to recognition of their credentials. The N.B. Act requires that regulators:
Administered by the Minister of Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour, the N.B. Act empowers the Minister to require regulators to report on how their registration practices comply with the legislation, and if necessary, take steps to ensure compliance. Compliance measures can include the issuance of compliance orders, the imposition of restrictions on regulatory bodies, and the imposition of administrative monetary penalties. While regulations to the N.B. Act have yet to be introduced, it’s expected they will contain specific information about reporting requirements, timelines, and compliance measures. New Brunswick regulatory bodies are wise to begin the review of their assessment and registration processes now, especially regarding internationally educated individuals.
Newfoundland and Labrador. Newfoundland & Labrador’s Fair Registration Practices Act will apply to 13 regulatory bodies in the province. The N.L. Act contains duties of fairness and transparency and requirements governing internal reviews of registration decision denials similar to those found in most provincial fair registration practices legislation. However, the N.L. Act appears much more prescriptive than other legislation regarding the imposition of requirements on regulators. For example, the N.L. Act requires regulators to report on registration practices on an annual basis and to:
The N.L. Department of Immigration, Population Growth, and Skills administers the N.L. Act, which also permits the establishment of a Fair Registration Practices Office to assist the Minister in exercising the powers and duties the legislation establishes. The N.L. Act also provides the Minister with certain specific powers, including the ability to:
While there aren’t yet any regulations, the N.L. Act itself provides a flavor of the regulations to come, including specific timelines for the processing of applications for registration.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our Regulation of Professions Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss best practices for complying with fair registration practices legislation.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2023. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Apr 4, 2024
In January 2024, the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island explored the doctrine of prematurity in the context of the legal test for a stay of…
Sep 18, 2023
Updated September 13, 2024 In its August 23, 2023 decision in Peterson v. College of Psychologists of Ontario, the Ontario Superior Court of…
Nov 8, 2022
The October 3, 2022, decision of the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal to dismiss the decision of the Newfoundland and Labrador Pharmacy…
Sep 28, 2022
On August 25, 2022, the P.E.I. Supreme Court dismissed an appeal of the P.E.I. College of Registered Nurses Hearing Committee in Llewellyn v.…
Jul 18, 2022
The Supreme Court of Canada’s “Jordan” framework, introducing strict timelines for determining unreasonable delay in the context of…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Jun 20, 2016
Real estate vendors and purchasers have high expectations of their realtors – and they don’t often hesitate to pursue legal action against…
Jun 17, 2016
In its June 16, 2016 decision in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Châteauguay (City), the Supreme Court of Canada decided a municipality’s…
Jun 10, 2016
Administrative monetary penalties, or “AMPs”, are a new phenomenon in the Canadian offshore. AMPs were introduced to the Newfoundland &…
Feb 9, 2015
NOTE: On April 14, 2016, the federal government proposed legislation setting out the conditions that a person wishing to undergo…
Jul 2, 2013
On June 14, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp…
Mar 15, 2013
Recent developments in Ontario and Yukon are an important reminder of the practical implications of the Crown’s legal Duty to Consult with…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.