August 28, 2017
Recently, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that a tax debtor’s bankruptcy does not extinguish the federal Crown’s priority to proceeds a secured creditor obtains from that tax debtor’s assets before its bankruptcy. Instead, the creditor’s positive obligation to pay any proceeds to the Crown in an amount up to the debtor’s GST/HST debt survives the debtor’s bankruptcy – and a creditor that fails to comply with this obligation will be personally liable to the Crown. It’s still possible the Crown’s deemed trust mechanism will find itself before the Supreme Court of Canada. But until then, creditors are well-advised to consider – carefully – a debtor’s tax situation when assessing whether to enforce security in light of the Appeal Court’s decision in Canada v. Callidus Capital Corporation. Here’s why.
The Crown’s deemed trust priority arises under section 222 of the Excise Tax Act (ETA): it allows the Crown to claim a tax debtor’s GST/HST arrears against a creditor that obtains proceeds from the debtor’s assets. Subsections 222(1) and 222(3) of the ETA provide that every person who collects GST or HST is deemed to hold the collected amount in trust for the Crown until it’s been remitted to the Receiver General. This deemed trust gives the Crown a super priority over all competing security interests in the debtor’s real and personal property up to the amount of the unremitted tax arrears (subject to prior registered mortgages, which is discussed in further details below). But subsection 222(1.1) provides that the deemed trust does not apply “at or after the time a person becomes a bankrupt”.
In the past, creditors have argued that subsection 222(1.1) confirms that a tax debtor’s bankruptcy triggers a priority reversal and retroactively extinguishes the Crown’s priority over the tax debtor’s assets, including any proceeds a creditor obtains by enforcing its security over the assets. A creditor that successfully enforced its security against the debtor’s assets would thus not be liable to the Crown upon the debtor’s bankruptcy and could keep any amounts it recovered from the debtor. But the Appeal Court’s decision confirms that, at least for the time being, this strategy is no longer available to creditors. Here’s why creditors should carefully consider a debtor’s tax situation when deciding whether to enforce its security:
The Crown isn’t required to give notice of a debtor’s GST/HST arrears. A creditor is obligated to pay proceeds from a tax debtor’s assets to the Crown whether – or not – that creditor is aware the debtor hasn’t remitted its taxes. The Crown’s deemed trust priority doesn’t require a crystallizing event, so the Crown isn’t required to give notice to creditors of the debtor’s tax arrears for the priority to exist.
The creditor can be personally liable for the debtor’s GST/HST arrears. Creditors should carefully consider the debtor’s financial situation and the possibility it may have unremitted taxes (for example, examining whether the Crown has obtained a judgment against the debtor): a creditor is personally liable to pay to the Crown any proceeds it obtains from the debtor’s assets up to the amount of the debtor’s unremitted taxes and won’t be protected by the debtor’s subsequent bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy might act as a catalyst for litigation against creditors. Once a tax debtor becomes bankrupt, the Crown loses its priority over the debtor’s assets and becomes an unsecured creditor for the balance of the unremitted taxes, significantly diminishing its ability to recover from the bankrupt debtor. Now that the Appeal Court has confirmed the creditor’s personal liability to the Crown for amounts obtained from the debtor’s assets, the Crown might more aggressively pursue creditors post-bankruptcy to recover amounts obtained from the debtor’s assets.
The deemed trust does not take priority over “prescribed security interests”. The Appeal Court’s decision doesn’t specifically address mortgages, but it’s important to note that subsection 222(4) of the ETA provides that the Crown’s deemed trust priority excludes “prescribed security interests”. Regulation defines this as the part of a mortgage that secures performance by the tax debtor of an obligation that is registered against the debtor’s real property before the debtor failed to remit collected taxes. However, the regulations also provide that the amount of a creditor’s prescribed security interest will be reduced by the value of any other security it holds to secure payment of the debtor’s obligations and any amounts paid towards the mortgage. Further, a deemed trust arising before the mortgage is registered will take priority and must be satisfied in full by the sale proceeds before any payments can be made to the creditor.
In Canada v. Callidus Capital Corporation, Cheese Factory Road Holdings Inc. failed to remit to the Crown the GST and HST it collected as part of its business operations, and defaulted on its obligations to Callidus under certain credit facilities. As part of a forbearance agreement with Callidus, Cheese Factory sold real property and transferred the net sale proceeds to Callidus. But before the sale closed, the Crown sent a letter to Callidus requesting that it pay the sale proceeds to the Crown up to the amount of Cheese Factory’s unremitted taxes pursuant to the deemed trust provisions. Callidus did not comply with the Crown’s letter and, several months later, Cheese Factory filed an assignment into bankruptcy at Callidus’ request. Shortly after the bankruptcy, the Crown sued Callidus seeking recovery of the sale proceeds on the basis it had priority over the amounts pursuant to the ETA’s deemed trust provisions. Callidus argued the bankruptcy retroactively extinguished the deemed trust and the Crown’s priority over the sale proceeds, so Callidus was entitled to keep the proceeds. Callidus succeeded at the initial hearing. The Crown appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal – and won:
Not at the Crown’s Expense. A secured creditor shouldn’t be allowed to recover from the debtor’s assets and avoid the consequences of the Crown’s deemed trust priority by subsequently petitioning the debtor into bankruptcy. In fact, Callidus conceded on appeal that the Crown had priority to the sale proceeds pre-bankruptcy, and Callidus had failed to abide with this priority. The Appeal Court decided a creditor should not be able to “choose the time of bankruptcy and liquidate the deemed trust assets so as to satisfy their interests at the expense of the Crown.”
Not Retroactively Extinguished. A debtor’s bankruptcy releases a tax debtor’s assets from the deemed trust under ETA section 222(1.1) – but it doesn’t retroactively extinguish the Crown’s deemed trust priority over the debtor’s assets. So a creditor that enforces its security and obtains proceeds from the debtor’s assets before the bankruptcy can be held personally liable to pay the Crown the proceeds up to the amount of the debtor’s tax arrears. In fact, the Crown’s cause of action against the creditor for breaching its statutory obligation to remit the proceeds to the Crown survives the debtor’s bankruptcy – meaning the Crown can sue creditors after a tax debtor’s bankruptcy for any proceeds recovered from the debtor’s assets.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2017. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Dec 4, 2024
Maximum penalties under the Underused Housing Tax Act (UHTA) are significant: initial penalties for a single taxation year can be as high as…
Nov 26, 2024
Understanding the taxation of Indigenous Peoples’ governments and structuring of their economic development initiatives is more relevant than…
Jun 4, 2024
Didn’t file your taxes on time – or made a mistake in your tax filings? All might not be lost. There is the possibility of relief from the…
Dec 12, 2023
Updated April 16, 2024. If you’re a trustee of a trust that might no longer serve its purpose or is sitting idle, now’s the time to…
Sep 29, 2023
Updated February 28, 2025. On December 15, 2023, the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act became law, giving developers of specific types…
Sep 25, 2023
There’s a new scam on the web: Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) scams. Most are familiar with established scams like phishing and ransomware and…
Sep 20, 2023
Can a business providing both exempt supplies and taxable supplies of goods and services claim Input Tax Credits (ITCs) under the Excise Tax Act…
Sep 11, 2023
Owning your own business offers many opportunities. But it also carries inherent risks, including exposure to personal liability. These three…
Jun 13, 2023
Effective April 27, 2023 the federal Pension Protection Act (Bill C-228), granting pensions “super priority” status over other secured and…
Apr 13, 2023
A Will is a key ingredient of any estate plan - and one of the most important documents a person ever signs. It allows a person to control how…
Jan 19, 2023
Updated January 31, 2025. Beginning December 31, 2022, certain owners of residential property in Canada are required to annually report and…
Nov 21, 2022
On November 10, 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada examined the interaction of arbitration and bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, deciding a…
Jul 12, 2022
Lawyers and accountants advise clients on options for organizing their personal and business affairs in a tax-efficient way. Clients enter into…
May 20, 2022
On May 22, 2010 (affectionately known as “Bitcoin Pizza Day”), a Floridian bought two Papa John's pizzas with Bitcoin. The day is famous…
May 2, 2022
On April 14, 2022, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Estate of Susan Lynn Williams, revisiting…
Aug 5, 2021
On July 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision protecting the status of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) as a…
Feb 12, 2021
Estate planning is a customized process; the goal is to create a plan that’s best for a person’s unique situation. And while all estate…
Feb 12, 2021
An ever increasing number of people originally from China now reside in Canada. It is more important than ever to recognize and understand the…
Oct 21, 2020
For business owners, estate planning is directed at protecting the business’s legacy as well as the financial security of both family members…
Oct 20, 2020
Updated March 7, 2025. Estate planning is directed at protecting your assets and your loved ones from creditors and unnecessary income tax or…
Jun 12, 2020
The financial technology (Fintech) industry uses technology to support and enhance financial and banking services.
May 21, 2019
Updated July 10, 2024. If you “own” a company incorporated under either the Canada Business Corporations Act or under the corporate…
Jun 12, 2018
This publication has been updated as at July 8, 2022. Changes to the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) over the past several years have…
Apr 2, 2018
Equity compensation plans are a valuable and versatile tool for many corporations, from early-stage startups to established blue-chips.…
Jan 12, 2018
Whether a provincial court will grant police a “production order” under the Criminal Code of Canada requiring a non-Canadian company to…
Oct 31, 2017
On October 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that a bank that pays out on a fraudulent cheque has the protection of section 20(5)…
Jul 17, 2017
A corporation does not always sail in calm or safe waters. Cash shortages, unattainable or unmet goals, Board disagreements over the best course…
Apr 21, 2017
In three years (lightning speed in the law), medically assisted dying went from being illegal to being legal. A great deal has changed, a great…
Jan 20, 2017
Connections between Canadians and the U.S. have never been as numerous or transparent as they are now: many Canadians own U.S. property, have…
Nov 22, 2016
On November 17, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada decided a mortgagee has the mortgagor’s implied consent to disclose its discharge statement…
Jun 30, 2016
The condo real estate market, both retail and commercial, is hot. But condo developers and unit buyers need funding. Here’s the legal…
May 31, 2016
You’re on a tight timeline to issue a press release. You finish your draft and ‘cut & paste’ your standard “forward-looking…
Oct 23, 2015
Subsection 55(2) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) is an anti-avoidance provision intended to prevent capital gains stripping by deeming an…
Oct 23, 2015
Incorporation offers legal advantages to sole proprietors of small businesses, including certain tax advantages. However, when a corporation…
Sep 16, 2014
Updated August 25, 2022. Many believe that only public companies or large, established companies with many shareholders need to be concerned…
May 22, 2014
Updated February 17, 2021. Trusts offer a very useful estate planning solution for a wide variety of special estate planning situations.…
Aug 28, 2013
Updated June 5, 2024. A general security agreement (GSA) is the most common form of personal property security to secure commercial loans and…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.