January 20, 2021
In the first update to the CCDC 2 since 2008, in December 2020 the Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) published the CCDC 2 (2020). In that time, the Canadian construction industry has undergone significant changes with the introduction, or planned introduction (as in, for example, Nova Scotia’s Builders’ Lien Act) of prompt payment legislation across the country. The CCDC 2 (2020) incorporates various changes introduced by prompt payment legislation, including recognition of the role of adjudication in resolving payment disputes. It also creates a wholly new completion milestone, “Ready-for-Takeover”. Given the major changes the CCDC 2 (2020) introduces, it is important that parties intending to rely on this contract understand the impact it will have on their contractual obligations. Parties are also wise to update any of the standard supplementary conditions upon which they previously relied under the old CCDC 2 (2008), as these might no longer be appropriate. Fortunately, to provide parties additional time to review and understand this update, the CCDC advised it will continue to publish the CCDC 2 (2008) for another year.
Here are eight key changes in the CCDC 2 (2020) and an overview of how they impact the parties’ contractual obligations under these commonly used contracts.
1. Payment Terms and Release of Holdback
The CCDC 2 (2020) includes numerous changes to payment terms and the release of holdback, most of which help align these contracts with prompt payment schemes. To that end, the CCDC 2 (2020) now defines “Payment Legislation” as “legislation in effect at the Place of the Work which governs payment under construction contracts” (that is, prompt payment legislation). The specific changes to the payment terms and release of holdback under the new CCDC 2 (2020) include:
2. Ready-for-Takeover & Early Occupancy
Another significant change in the CCDC 2 (2020) is the introduction of a new completion milestone, “Ready-for-Takeover”.
Ready-for-Takeover Conditions. Under the new General Condition 12.1, this milestone is achieved when the Consultant confirms various conditions are satisfied, including:
The Consultant’s certification of both Substantial Performance of the Work and evidence of compliance with the requirement for an occupancy permit are mandatory for achieving Ready-for-Takeover. However, if any of these remaining items are delayed because of conditions reasonably beyond the Contractor’s control, or by an agreement between the Owner and the Contractor, Ready-for-Takeover must not be delayed.
Ready-for-Takeover Application. When the Contractor considers it has achieved Ready-for-Takeover, the Contractor must deliver to the Consultant and the Owner a written application for Ready-for-Takeover, containing a list of the remaining items to be completed or corrected. After submitting this application, the Consultant has 10 days to either
Early Occupancy. The CCDC 2 (2020) also allows the Owner to take early occupancy of part, or the entirety, of the Work before Ready-for-Takeover has been attained. However, the Owner can only take occupancy of the Work upon the Contractor’s agreement and with approval of the relevant authorities. Where the Owner takes occupancy of the Work before Ready-for-Takeover has been attained, the Contractor ceases to be liable for the care of the part of the Work occupied by the Owner, and the warranty period for that part of the Work starts from the date on which it is occupied. And where the Owner takes occupancy of the entirety of the Work before Ready-for-Takeover has been achieved, this does not relieve the Contractor from its responsibility to complete the Work in a timely manner.
3. Valuation of Change Directives
The CCDC 2 (2020) also revises the allowable costs in the valuation of Change Directives, and clarifies that these costs can only be charged if they contribute directly to the implementation of the Change Directive. The new GC 6.3 allows the Contractor to charge for any of these additional costs:
However, with the deletion of GC 6.3.6.1(2) and (4) from the CCDC 2 (2008), the Contractor can no longer charge for wages of personnel engaged in the preparation or review of Shop Drawings, fabrication drawings, and coordination drawings, or for wages of personnel engaged in the process of changes in the Work.
4. Adjudication
Recognizing the significant role of adjudication under new prompt payment legislation, a new general condition, GC 8.2 – ADJUDICATION, has been added. This condition clarifies that nothing in the Contract affects the parties’ rights to resolve any dispute by adjudication pursuant to prompt payment legislation.
5. Delays
While GC 6.5.1 (Owner-caused delays) and GC 6.5.3 (delays outside the Contractor’s control) remain unchanged, GC 6.5.2 provides that if, due to a stop work order issued by a court or other public authority, the Contractor fails to achieve Ready-for-Takeover on the date agreed by the parties, then the Contract Time will be extended for such time as the Consultant may recommended, in consultation with the Contractor, and the Owner will reimburse the Contractor for costs incurred as a result of the delay.
6. Indemnification & Waiver
The timing for indemnification (GC 13.1) and for waiver of claims (GC 13.2) is now determined with reference to the date of Ready-for-Takeover. Furthermore, the Contractor and Owner’s indemnification obligation are now expressly limited to direct loss and damage, and exclude indemnification for indirect, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages (GC 13.1.2).
7. Cash Allowances
Under the new GC 4.1.4, cash allowances can be reallocated to cover unexpected shortfalls. Accordingly, where the actual cost of the Work under any particular cash allowance exceeds the allowance amount, the Consultant can direct that any unexpended amounts from other cash allowances be reallocated to cover that shortfall. In such case, there would be no additional amount added to the Contract Price. The Contractor will only be compensated for the excess cost where the actual cost of the Work under all cash allowances exceeds the total amount of all cash allowances.
8. Safety
With the deletion of the old GC 3.2.2., the Contractor is now responsible for overall health and safety on the Project, even where the Owner brings on other contractors or work is completed by the Owner’s own forces. However, under GC 9.4.2, both the Owner and the Contractor are now responsible for complying with all health and safety regulations and requirements.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our Construction Law Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2021. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Jul 26, 2024
The nature of the construction industry, especially when it comes to seasonal work and where the labour needs and costs must be estimated in…
Jul 17, 2024
In a typical construction project, the owner has a contract with the prime contractor, the prime contractor has a contract with the…
Apr 2, 2024
Canadian provinces and territories continue to swiftly legislate prompt payment requirements – though not all are taking effect quite so…
Nov 1, 2023
On October 13, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its judicial reference opinion: a significant portion of Canada’s federal…
Sep 29, 2023
Updated February 9, 2024. On December 15, 2023, Bill C-56, the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act, became law, giving developers of…
Apr 12, 2023
The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has made it clear that, while the burden is high, pre-emptively vacating or discharging a builders’ lien is a…
Mar 16, 2023
Updated Feburary 9, 2024. On January 1, 2023, the Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians Act and accompanying…
May 2, 2022
On April 14, 2022, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal released its decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Estate of Susan Lynn Williams, revisiting…
Nov 19, 2021
To help realtors better prepare their clients to ensure smooth real estate transactions with timely closings, here are the answers to the 10…
Sep 9, 2021
Updated February 28, 2024. The New Brunswick Construction Remedies Act substantially came into effect on November 1, 2021, and took full…
Feb 4, 2020
Canada’s construction industry is abuzz with the latest innovation in lien legislation. Prompt payment requirements are being added to…
Nov 17, 2017
It’s official: as of October 31, 2017, “facilitation payments” contravene Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA).…
Aug 16, 2017
In the not-so-distant past, Canadian enforcement of its anti-corruption and anti-bribery legal regime has been relatively laid-back. But the…
Apr 17, 2017
Recreational cannabis isn’t legal yet - but much of the associated stigma is already gone, usage is up and employers are feeling the workplace…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Sep 12, 2016
On September 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Musqueam Indian Band v. Musqueam Indian Band (Board of Review) that an Indian band…
Jun 30, 2016
The condo real estate market, both retail and commercial, is hot. But condo developers and unit buyers need funding. Here’s the legal…
Jun 20, 2016
Real estate vendors and purchasers have high expectations of their realtors – and they don’t often hesitate to pursue legal action against…
Jun 17, 2016
In its June 16, 2016 decision in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Châteauguay (City), the Supreme Court of Canada decided a municipality’s…
May 10, 2016
On May 6, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada generally affirmed the common law rule that positive covenants do not run with the land. More…
May 2, 2016
Updated October 4, 2023. Workplace accidents regularly lead to charges under occupational health and safety (OHS) law. These charges can be…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Mar 9, 2016
On January 11, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sentenced a front-line supervisor to imprisonment for 3½ years for four counts of…
Jun 25, 2015
Updated October 4, 2023. Most people know a company itself has occupational health and safety (OHS) obligations and risks corporate liability…
May 25, 2015
We updated this publication on July 21, 2022. Every party to a Right of Way has some idea of what that Right of Way is – but many times,…
Mar 3, 2015
Snow can be a big nuisance at this time of year, but snow load - the weight of the snow, usually measured in pounds per square foot - can be…
Dec 1, 2014
The construction industry - project owners, contractors, subcontractors and trades - might be relaxing, ignoring the hype around Canada’s…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.