November 19, 2020
We updated this publication on June 30, 2022.
NOTE: On June 16, 2022, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-27: Digital Charter Implementation Act, 2022 to implement a revised versions of the Consumer Privacy Protection Act (CPPA). Learn more about the latest version of the CPPA at Canada’s New Consumer Privacy Protection Act (CPPA): 12 PIPEDA Differences.
On November 17, 2020, the federal government proposed dramatic changes to how Canada will enforce privacy law, ushering in a new legal regime to protect individuals’ personal information – and to regulate organizations’ privacy practices. Bill C-11: The Digital Charter Implementation Act creates the Consumer Privacy Protection Act (CPPA) to replace the federal Personal Information and Electronics Documents Act (PIPEDA), and codify in law organizations’ obligations respecting the collection, use and disclosure of personal information rather than merely rely on the Canadian Standard Association (CSA) Model Code. Though the Digital Charter was an important part of the current federal government’s 2019 election platform, it was not one of the key issues in its 2021 election platform. It’s not yet clear whether or when the Bill will become law. However, Quebec’s recent adoption of Bill 64 introducing new standards for individual privacy rights inspired by the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) helps keep top of mind the need to update Canada’s federal privacy laws.
The current consensus seems to be that it’s necessary to revise the Digital Charter, including the CPPA, before it’s passed. But the current form of the Digital Charter still gives organizations a sense of what to expect, and the necessary compliance processes they could be looking at, if the CPPA (or some form of it) passes. Here are 10 ways the Consumer Privacy Protection Act, in its present form, will impact organizations’ Canadian privacy practices.
1. Big Penalties. There will be significant penalties for non-compliance with the CPPA. It authorizes administrative monetary penalties and fines of up to 5% of global revenue or $25 million, whichever is higher, for the most serious offences. Currently, PIPEDA only authorizes penalties for breach of the Digital Privacy Act, and those are markedly lower than those under the CPPA: the maximum fine for breaching the Digital Privacy Act is $100,000 per violation (though if there were multiple violations, which would not be uncommon, the fines could add up).
2. Privacy Commissioner Powers. In a move away from the traditional ombudsman model, the CPPA gives the federal Privacy Commissioner broad power to make orders against organizations and to recommend penalties to a new “Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal”. Under PIPEDA, the Privacy Commissioner only has the power to make recommendations to a breaching organization.
3. New Tribunal. A new “Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal” will determine and levy any penalties – which will have the effect of a court order – and hear appeals from orders of the Privacy Commissioner.
4. Global Application. The new law takes an expansive approach to applicability, expressly applying to all personal information an organization collects, uses or discloses, including interprovincially or internationally. This reflects the increased digitization and globalization of the global economy, which knows no border, and which the COVID-19 Pandemic has accelerated.
5. New Right of Action. It creates a new privacy breach legal claim. Where the Privacy Commissioner decides an organization violated an individual’s privacy under the CPPA, and the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal upholds that finding, that individual can sue the organization (within 2 years) for compensation for the violation.
6. Data Portability & Deletion. It provides for new individual rights of data portability and deletion. Consumers can require an organization to transfer their data to another organization (subject to regulations that aren’t yet available), likely to be a boon to open banking. Individuals can also require that an organization delete the personal information it’s collected about them, subject to some limitations, in what appears to be a limited form of the “right to erasure”.
7. Algorithmic Transparency. It requires algorithmic transparency. Consumers would now have the right to require an organization to explain how an automated decision-making system made a prediction, recommendation or decision.
8. Consent Exceptions. It “simplifies” consent requirements for organizations by making some (potentially broad) exceptions to when an organization must obtain an individual’s consent to the collection, use or disclosure of the individual’s personal information, such as where the use of personal information is core to the delivery of a product or service. This could impact, for example, the information an organization must communicate in a privacy policy.
9. Data De-Identification. It makes new rules around the de-identification of data – including allowing for organizations to use an individual’s personal information without their consent in order to de-identify their data, but appears to limit other uses of de-identified data. Under certain circumstances, organizations can also disclose de-identified data to public entities for socially beneficial purposes.
10. Codes of Practice. It introduces the concept of “Codes of Practice”. The CPPA allows private organizations to establish a “code” and internal certification programs for complying with the law that the Privacy Commissioner will approve. Once approved, the “code” will effectively establish the organization’s legal compliance obligations.
Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of the Privacy, Data Protection & Cyber Security Law Team @ McInnes Cooper to discuss how we can help you prepare for the new CPPA.
McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.
© McInnes Cooper, 2020. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at [email protected] to request our consent.
Oct 29, 2024
On September 9, 2024, a unanimous Federal Court of Appeal decided consent is to be determined on an objective standard. In an unusual move, in…
Aug 15, 2024
On June 21, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded – decisively - that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms applies to protect the…
Jul 16, 2024
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has been looking for a new production order power; it’s on its way. The role of CSIS is to…
Jun 26, 2024
An increasing number of municipalities in Canada are using public video camera surveillance to promote public safety and help deter crimes like…
Jun 20, 2024
On April 30, 2024, the Ontario Divisional Court decided the victim of a serious cyber security incident was required to produce to privacy…
Apr 30, 2024
Bill C-63, if passed, will create the hotly anticipated Online Harms Act to regulate certain online platforms, create new Criminal Code of…
Mar 14, 2024
On March 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada decided a police request for disclosure of an IP address is a “search” under section 8 of the…
Dec 15, 2023
Over four years after it began, the federal government still hasn’t finalized its overhaul of the private sector privacy law regime that both…
Sep 25, 2023
There’s a new scam on the web: Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) scams. Most are familiar with established scams like phishing and ransomware and…
Jun 9, 2023
You arrive at the legendary Madison Square Garden to catch the Mariah Carey concert. It’s the big event of the trip – the reason you came to…
Apr 27, 2023
The benefits to employees, and often to employers, of remote work has made it a staple of today’s workplace. But the move to remote work…
Feb 1, 2023
On January 26, 2023, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) released a report of findings requiring companies using targeted…
Jan 26, 2023
In November 2022, the Ontario Court of Appeal definitively decided an organization whose information systems are breached by a malicious third…
Jul 20, 2022
There’s a new privacy law coming to Canada. In June, the federal government introduced a complete overhaul of the privacy law regime that both…
Jun 30, 2022
On June 16, 2022, the federal government took a second shot at a complete overhaul of the private sector privacy law regime that both protects…
Dec 16, 2021
Updated October 7, 2024. The name of the game is to have a plan to mitigate the risk that a data breach will happen – but be ready when it…
Jan 26, 2021
Updated March 4, 2022. Privacy is critical to every business in every sector, including startups and growing businesses: to comply with the…
Mar 28, 2019
Organizations subject to Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) – those that collect, use or…
Feb 20, 2019
On February 14, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada decided yet another criminal law decision that will likely have broader ramifications for…
Dec 19, 2018
On December 13, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that a third party can’t waive a person’s right to privacy or their rights under…
Aug 20, 2018
Updated July 8, 2024. Every organization subject to Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA, soon to…
Aug 3, 2018
Updated June 28, 2024. As of November 1, 2018, organizations in Canada subject to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic…
Jun 13, 2018
Updated September 26, 2024. Businesspeople (and their legal counsel) are on the road more than ever before: according to Statistics Canada,…
Jan 12, 2018
Whether a provincial court will grant police a “production order” under the Criminal Code of Canada requiring a non-Canadian company to…
Jun 28, 2017
On June 28, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed a Canadian court can issue an interlocutory injunction (an order requiring an entity or…
Jun 23, 2017
On June 23, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that in a contest between the choice of forum clause in Facebook’s online terms of use…
Jun 7, 2017
On June 7, 2017, the federal government repealed the regulations that would have brought into effect the sections of Canada’s Anti Spam…
Feb 24, 2017
Updated January 29, 2024. Most organizations (72%) store the personal information of customers. employees, suppliers, vendors or partners,…
Jan 25, 2017
Doing business with the public sector creates an often overlooked – but very real – risk that the confidential information a business…
Nov 22, 2016
On November 17, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada decided a mortgagee has the mortgagor’s implied consent to disclose its discharge statement…
Mar 24, 2016
When a business responds to a public sector Request for Proposal or Expression of Interest (both of which we’ll refer to as an RFP for these…
Jan 27, 2016
On January 21, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dramatically expanded the scope of legal privacy protection – and the liability…
Mar 25, 2015
On March 3, 2015 Canada’s Privacy Commissioner determined that Health Canada breached privacy laws by mailing letters to over 40,000 Marihuana…
Mar 6, 2015
On March 5, 2015, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (the CRTC, the main agency charged with administering and enforcing most of CASL)…
Dec 11, 2014
On December 11, 2014 the Supreme Court of Canada continued its trend to recognize privacy rights – and develop the law to protect them –…
Dec 11, 2014
On January 15, 2015, the software provisions of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) will take effect. CASL’s anti-spam sections, touted…
Dec 1, 2014
The construction industry - project owners, contractors, subcontractors and trades - might be relaxing, ignoring the hype around Canada’s…
Oct 14, 2014
CASL’s anti-spam sections came into force on July 1, 2014. Every organization that CASL affects should now be complying with it – and their…
Aug 1, 2014
Most Canadians have heard about Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL): we’ve been bombarded with “CASL Compliant” emails asking us to…
Jun 16, 2014
On June 13, 2014 the Supreme Court of Canada decided that Canadians have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their online activities, and…
Jun 12, 2014
The countdown to CASL is almost over: there are only 13 business days until the anti-spam provisions of CASL – and most of the penalties for…
May 8, 2014
On July 1, 2014 – less than two months from now - the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) take effect. Individuals…
Apr 15, 2014
The countdown to CASL is on: on July 1, 2014, the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (“CASL”) take effect. Individuals…
Feb 28, 2014
On July 1, 2014, the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (aka “CASL”) will take effect. CASL is: Broad. It applies…
Feb 28, 2014
On July 1, 2014, the anti-spam sections of Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (aka “CASL”) take effect. CASL will apply to just about every…
Nov 8, 2013
On November 7, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canda decided police require specific authorization in a search warrant to search the data in a…
Nov 28, 2012
On October 19, 2012 the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decided a teacher criminally charged with possession of child pornography and unauthorized…
Subscribe to McInnes Cooper to stay current with our leading insights on legal updates, trends, news, events, and services.